Distinction between Rule 45 vs. Rule 65 of the Rules of Court

Rule 45 Rule 65
It is a mode of appeal: A continuation of the appellate process over the original case It is a special civil action: An original action and not a mode of appeal
Intended to review final judgments or orders of the lower court May be directed against an interlocutory order of the court or where no appeal or plain or speedy remedy is available in the ordinary course of law
Only pure questions of law can be raised Raises the question of jurisdiction – where the tribunal, body, board, or officer exercising judicial or quasi-judicial functions acted with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction (GADALEJ)
Filing: within 15 days from notice of judgment or final order appealed from Filing: within 60 days from notice of judgment or final order or resolution being assailed
Does not require a Motion for Reconsideration process MR is a condition precedent for filing the petition, subject to exceptional circumstances
Extension of 30 days may be granted under justifiable grounds Extension may only be granted under exceptional grounds
Stays the judgment appealed from Does not stay the judgment or order unless enjoined/restrained
Parties: original parties Parties: The tribunal, board, or officer, exercising judicial or quasi-judicial functions is impleaded as
respondent
Review by the SC is discretionary and will be granted only when there are special or important reasons [Sec. 6, Rule 45] Review by the SC is discretionary and will be granted only when there are special or important reasons [Sec. 6, Rule 45]

Related Posts